1@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
2@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired Browne.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
3@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed the office to Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
4@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed Browne the office.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
5@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams bet Browne a dollar that Chiang hired Devito.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
6@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams became competent.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
7@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams became a manager.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
8@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams became in the office.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
9@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams became working.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
10@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is interviewing an applicant.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
11@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is interviewing.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
12@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is working for Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
13@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is working.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
14@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works for Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
15@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works of Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
16@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approves of Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
17@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approves for Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
18@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She hired him.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
19@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He hired her.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
20@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She hired he.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
21@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He hired she.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
22@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Her hired he.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
23@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Him hired she.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
24@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Her hired him.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
25@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Him hired her.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
26@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He showed it to her.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
27@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He showed her it.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
28@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He showed her an office.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
29@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He showed it to Chiang.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
30@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He showed Chiang it.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
31@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He interviewed them.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
32@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He interviewed they.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
33@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@They interviewed him.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
34@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Them interviewed him.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
35@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
36@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed me.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
37@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Me interviewed Abrams.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
38@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed I.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
39@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@We interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
40@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed us.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
41@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Us interviewed Abrams.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
42@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed we.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
43@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
44@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed you.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
45@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She and I interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
46@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I and she interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
47@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Me and her interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
48@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Her and me interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
49@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Her and I interviewed Abrams.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
50@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She and me interviewed Abrams.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
51@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Me and she interviewed Abrams.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
52@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I and her interviewed Abrams.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
53@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed her and me.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
54@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed she and I.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
55@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed me and her.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
56@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed I and she.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
57@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed her and I.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
58@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed she and me.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
59@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed me and she.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
60@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed I and her.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
61@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She works for whom?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
62@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She works for who?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
63@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She manages whom?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
64@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She manages who?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
65@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She showed whom an office?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
66@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She showed who an office?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
67@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whom does she work for?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
68@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does she work for?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
69@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@For whom does she work?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
70@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@For who does she work?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
71@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who hired Browne?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
72@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whom hired Browne?@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
73@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is time for an interview.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
74@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It are time for an interview.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
75@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
76@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It are true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
77@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is a bookcase in the office.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
78@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are programmers.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
79@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
80@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is programmers.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
81@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are programmers interviewing Devito.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
82@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is programmers interviewing Devito.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
83@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are programmers older than Devito.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
84@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is programmers older than Devito.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
85@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are a bookcase in the office@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
86@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is programmers.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
87@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are programmers managers.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
88@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There stands in the office a bookcase.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
89@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is Abrams, Browne, and Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
90@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A manager works.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
91@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Managers work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
92@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A manager work.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
93@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Managers works.@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
94@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
95@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I works.@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
96@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
97@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You works.@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
98@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He works.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
99@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He work.@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
100@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@We work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
101@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@We works.@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
102@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@They work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
103@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@They works.@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
104@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired this employee.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
105@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired these employees.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
106@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired these employee.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
107@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired this employees.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
108@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List women who have bookcases.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
109@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List women which have bookcases.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
110@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List bookcases who women have.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
111@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List bookcases which women have.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
112@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A manager is an employee.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
113@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Managers are employees.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
114@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A manager is employees.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
115@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Managers are an employee.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
116@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The woman evaluated herself.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
117@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The woman evaluated himself.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
118@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The women evaluated themselves.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
119@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The women evaluated herself.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
120@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The woman showed an office to herself.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
121@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The woman showed herself an office.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
122@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed the programmers to themselves.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
123@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed the programmers themselves.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
124@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed themselves the programmers.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
125@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams evaluated himself and Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
126@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams evaluated Browne and himself.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
127@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The woman evaluated her own staff.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
128@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The woman evaluated his own staff.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
129@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The women evaluated their own staffs.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
130@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The women evaluated her own staffs.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
131@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams may hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
132@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams might hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
133@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams can hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
134@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
135@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams shall hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
136@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams should hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
137@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams will hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
138@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams would hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
139@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams must hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
140@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams dare hire Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
141@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams need hire Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
142@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams did hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
143@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has hired Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
144@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is hiring Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
145@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is to hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
146@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams had better hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
147@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams better hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
148@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams ought to hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
149@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams used to hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
150@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could have hired Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
151@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could be hiring Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
152@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could have been hiring Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
153@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
154@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne could be interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
155@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne has been interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
156@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is being interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
157@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne could have been interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
158@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne could be being interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
159@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne could have been being interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
160@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could hired Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
161@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could hiring Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
162@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has hire Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
163@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has hiring Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
164@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is hire Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
165@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is hired Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
166@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has could hire Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
167@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is coulding hire Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
168@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is having hired Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
169@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has could be hiring Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
170@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could be having hired Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
171@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams could may hire Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
172@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has had hired Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
173@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is being hiring Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
174@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams did could hire Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
175@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams did have hired Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
176@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams did be hiring Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
177@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is could interviewed by Abrams.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
178@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is had interviewed by Abrams.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
179@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne did be interviewed by Abrams.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
180@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is did interviewed by Abrams.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
181@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is been interviewed by Abrams.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
182@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams knew who to hire.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
183@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams knew who Browne hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
184@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams knew that Browne hired Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
185@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams laid off a programmer.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
186@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams laid a programmer off.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
187@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams managed to hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
188@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams managed to evaluate himself.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
189@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There managed to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
190@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It managed to be time for an interview.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
191@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It managed to be true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
192@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams promised Browne to hire Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
193@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He promised us to evaluate himself.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
194@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He promised us to evaluate ourselves.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
195@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams promised there to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
196@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams promised Browne to be interviewed by Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
197@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was promised by Abrams to hire Chiang.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
198@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was promised to hire Chiang.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
199@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams urged Browne to hire Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
200@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was urged to hire Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
201@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams urged Browne to be interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
202@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was urged to be interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
203@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams urged there to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
204@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams urged it to be time for an interview.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
205@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams urged it to be true that Browne hired Chiang.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
206@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He urged them to evaluate themselves.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
207@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He urged them to evaluate himself.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
208@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams appealed to Browne to hire Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
209@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams appealed to Browne to be interviewed.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
210@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams appealed to there to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
211@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams appealed to it to be time for an interview.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
212@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He appealed to us to evaluate ourselves.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
213@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He appealed to us to evaluate himself.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
214@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams failed to hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
215@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams failed to evaluate himself.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
216@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There fails to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
217@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There fail to be bookcases in the office.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
218@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It failed to be time for an interview.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
219@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It failed to be true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
220@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There fail to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
221@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams failed to be interviewed by Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
222@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne has been being interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
223@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@To interview Browne was failed by Abrams.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
224@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams caused Browne to hire Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
225@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams caused Browne to be hired by Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
226@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He caused us to evaluate ourselves.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
227@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He caused us to evaluate himself.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
228@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams knew there to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
229@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There was known to be a bookcase in the office.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
230@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams knew it to be time for an interview.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
231@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was known to be time for an interview.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
232@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams knew it to be true that Browne hired Chiang.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
233@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was known to be true that Chiang was hired by Browne.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
234@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams made Browne hire Chiang.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
235@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams made there be a bookcase in the office.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
236@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams made it be time for an interview.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
237@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams failed to hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
238@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams helped hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
239@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams sees Browne as being a competent manager.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
240@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams sees Browne as a competent manager.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
241@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams sees there as being a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
242@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams sees there as a bookcase in the office.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
243@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams smiled himself into an interview.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
244@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works with a telephone.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
245@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was hired by Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
246@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was hired.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
247@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He was hired by her.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
248@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Him was hired by her.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
249@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He was hired by she.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
250@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An office was shown to Abrams by Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
251@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An office was shown to Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
252@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An office was shown by Abrams to Chiang.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
253@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang was shown an office by Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
254@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An office was shown Chiang by Abrams.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
255@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was urged to hire Browne by Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
256@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was urged by Chiang to hire Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
257@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was urged to hire Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
258@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was known to be interviewing Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
259@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was known by Chiang to be interviewing Browne.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
260@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was known to be interviewing Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
261@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There was known to be a bookcase in Browne's office.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
262@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was known to be time for an interview.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
263@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was known to be true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
264@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There was urged to be a bookcase in Browne's office.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
265@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was urged to be time for an interview.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
266@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was urged to be true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
267@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was made to interview Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
268@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was made interview Browne.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
269@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams got hired by Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
270@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams got hired.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
271@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams had Browne hired by Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
272@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams had Browne hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
273@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was approved of by Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
274@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was approved of.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
275@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was appealed to to hire Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
276@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was unevaluated by Chiang.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
277@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was unevaluated.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
278@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is competent.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
279@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is good at interviews.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
280@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is a manager.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
281@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is a manager of programmers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
282@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is in the office.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
283@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is of programmers.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
284@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is the manager of the project.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
285@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@That office, the consultants work in.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
286@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@To Browne, Abrams showed an office.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
287@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Competent, Abrams is.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
288@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Hire Browne, Abrams did.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
289@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Not one programmer did Abrams hire.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
290@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@At no time did Abrams hire a programmer.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
291@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@No more competent was Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
292@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A trustworthy employee is Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
293@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@In the office is the bookcase.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
294@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Competent is the manager who hired Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
295@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Standing in the office is the bookcase.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
296@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Never does Abrams work with Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
297@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@In the office is a good location for the bookcase.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
298@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman who was competent.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
299@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired women who were competent.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
300@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman who were competent.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
301@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired women who was competent.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
302@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired women whose manager was competent.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
303@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman who Browne interviewed.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
304@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman who Browne approved of.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
305@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman who Browne knew Chiang interviewed.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
306@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has a bookcase which is heavy.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
307@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has a bookcase that is heavy.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
308@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has a bookcase what is heavy.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
309@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office that Browne showed Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
310@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office which Browne showed Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
311@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office Browne showed Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
312@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office that Browne showed to Chiang.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
313@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office which Browne showed to Chiang.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
314@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed a woman who Browne showed an office to.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
315@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office Browne showed to Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
316@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman that was competent.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
317@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman was competent.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
318@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman that Browne interviewed.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
319@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman Browne interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
320@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman that Browne approved of.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
321@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman Browne approved of.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
322@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman that Browne knew Chiang interviewed.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
323@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman Browne knew Chiang interviewed.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
324@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List every programmer that there is interviewing Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
325@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List projects there are consultants on.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
326@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List managers of projects who interview Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
327@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List managers who interview Abrams of projects.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
328@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman Browne interviewed who Chiang approved of.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
329@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman who Browne interviewed Chiang approved of.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
330@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It that is time for an interview is true that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@0@13@@oe@8-sep-1999
331@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There that was a programmer was a consultant on a project.@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
332@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman interviewed by Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
333@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman working for Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
334@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman to interview Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
335@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired anyone knowing that Devito manages Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
336@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired anyone competent to work on the project.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
337@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has an office with a bookcase.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
338@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approved of what Chiang did.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
339@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approved of who Chiang hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
340@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approved of where Chiang worked.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
341@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman of whom Chiang approved.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
342@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman of who Chiang approved.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
343@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has a bookcase of which Chiang approved.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
344@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has a bookcase of that Chiang approved.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
345@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman the manager of whom Chiang had interviewed.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
346@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman the manager of who Chiang had interviewed.@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
347@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman the manager of that Chiang had interviewed.@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
348@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a woman whose manager Chiang had interviewed.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
349@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed programmers whose manager was Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
350@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed programmers whose manager were Chiang.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
351@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which project is Abrams a programmer and the manager of?@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
352@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which project does Abrams manage this department and?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
353@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which managers are there programmers who work for?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
354@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which manager did Abrams have an office that Chiang showed to?@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
355@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which projects does Abrams know who had worked on?@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
356@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which managers does Abrams know which offices Browne had shown to?@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
357@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer did Abrams know which office had?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
358@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer was that Abrams had interviewed known by Browne?@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
359@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is Abrams a manager?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
360@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams be a manager?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
361@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is Abrams competent?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
362@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Are Abrams competent?@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
363@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is there a bookcase in Browne's office?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
364@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Are there bookcases in Browne's office?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
365@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Are there a bookcase in Browne's office?@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
366@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does there be a bookcase in Browne's office?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
367@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is it time for an interview?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
368@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is it true that Abrams hired Browne?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
369@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Are it time for an interview?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
370@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does it be time for an interview?@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
371@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Are it true that Abrams hired Browne?@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
372@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does it be true that Abrams hired Browne?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
373@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams interview?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
374@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams interview?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
375@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is Abrams interviewing?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
376@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has Abrams interviewed?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
377@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams be interviewing?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
378@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams have interviewed?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
379@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has Abrams been interviewing?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
380@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams have been interviewing?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
381@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has been Abrams interviewing?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
382@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has Abrams is interviewing?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
383@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has Abrams be interviewing.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
384@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Have Abrams could be interviewing.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
385@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams have been interviewed by Browne?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
386@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has Abrams been interviewed by Browne?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
387@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams interviewed by Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
388@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams interviewed?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
389@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams being interviewed by Browne?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
390@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams be interviewed by Browne?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
391@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams been interviewing by Browne?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
392@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams interview Browne or does Browne interview Abrams?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
393@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams interview Browne or Browne interview Abrams?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
394@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams work for Browne or work for Chiang?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
395@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams work for Browne or for Chiang?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
396@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams work for Browne or Chiang?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
397@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams interview Browne or was Abrams interviewed by Browne?@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
398@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams interviewed by Browne or Browne interviewed by Chiang?@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
399@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams interviewed by Browne or by Chiang?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
400@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Was Abrams interviewed by Browne or Chiang?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
401@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who works for Chiang?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
402@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who is a manager?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
403@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who will be a manager?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
404@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who is managed by Abrams?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
405@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What was shown to Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
406@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer works for Abrams?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
407@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer is a manager?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
408@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer will be a manager?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
409@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer was hired by Abrams?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
410@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Chiang employ?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
411@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What did Abrams show Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
412@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What did Abrams show to Browne?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
413@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What was Abrams shown?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
414@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which manager did Abrams know was interviewing programmers?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
415@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which managers did Abrams know were interviewing programmers?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
416@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which manager did Abrams know were interviewing programmers?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
417@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which managers did Abrams know was interviewing programmers?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
418@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmer did Abrams interview?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
419@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What project does Abrams manage?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
420@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which office was Abrams shown?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
421@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Where does Abrams work?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
422@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Where was Abrams interviewed?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
423@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When did Abrams hire Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
424@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When did Abrams show an office to Browne?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
425@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When was Abrams hired?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
426@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How many programmers does Abrams manage?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
427@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How many programmers are there working for Abrams?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
428@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How many programmers were hired by Abrams?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
429@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Abrams work for?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
430@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which office does Abrams work in?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
431@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whom did Abrams show an office to?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
432@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who is Browne managed by?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
433@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department is Abrams the manager of?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
434@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whose department does Abrams work in?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
435@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Of whom does Abrams approve?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
436@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@In which office does Abrams work?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
437@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@To whom did Abrams show an office?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
438@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Abrams show an office?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
439@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was shown an office by Abrams?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
440@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@By whom is Browne managed?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
441@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Of which department is Abrams the manager?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
442@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@In whose department does Abrams work?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
443@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whose manager did Abrams hire?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
444@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whose did Abrams hire manager?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
445@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department's manager did Abrams interview?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
446@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department did Abrams interview manager?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
447@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department's did Abrams interview manager?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
448@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Whose manager's office was Abrams interviewed in?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
449@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How competent is Abrams?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
450@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How is Abrams competent?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
451@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know who hired Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
452@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know who was hired by Browne.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
453@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know which managers interviewed Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
454@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know who Browne hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
455@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know who showed Browne an office.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
456@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know who Browne was hired by.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
457@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know whom Browne was hired by.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
458@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know by whom Browne was hired.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
459@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know which programmers Browne hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
460@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know where Browne works.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
461@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know when Browne was hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
462@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know how many consultants Browne has hired.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
463@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not know how competent Browne is.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
464@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who interviewed whom?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
465@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who interviewed who?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
466@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was interviewed by whom?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
467@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did who interview?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
468@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was who interviewed by?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
469@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@By whom was who interviewed?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
470@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed who?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
471@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed by whom?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
472@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed by who?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
473@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is (two days) older than Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
474@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is (two days) older than thirty years.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
475@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is more competent than Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
476@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is as competent as Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
477@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is the oldest manager.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
478@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is the most competent manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
479@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne manages.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
480@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages as many programmers as Browne manages.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
481@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne was interviewed by.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
482@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed more programmers than were hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
483@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed as many programmers as were hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
484@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed as many programmers as were not hired.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
485@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams did not interview as many programmers as were hired.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
486@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has managed more projects than Browne has worked on.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
487@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed more programmers than was hired.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
488@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has managed more projects than consultants has worked on.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
489@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed more programmers than Browne showed offices to.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
490@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has more bookcases than Browne showed to Chiang.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
491@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is (two days) older than Browne is.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
492@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is (twice) as old as Browne is.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
493@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is (two days) older than Browne are.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
494@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works harder than Browne works.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
495@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne manages engineers.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
496@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is as competent as Browne is trustworthy.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
497@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne does.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
498@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages as many programmers as Browne does.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
499@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works harder than Browne does.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
500@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne do.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
501@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams became more competent than Browne did.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
502@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne does engineers.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
503@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages as many programmers as Browne does engineers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
504@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams became more competent than Browne did trustworthy.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
505@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne do engineers.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
506@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
507@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is (twice) as old as Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
508@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang works harder than Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
509@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More managers know Abrams is competent than trustworthy.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
510@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired more programmers than was known by Browne.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
511@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired more programmers than were known by Browne.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
512@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More programmers than engineers arrived.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
513@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@As many programmers as engineers arrived.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
514@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More programmers than engineers arrives.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
515@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More programmers than engineers were hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
516@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More programmers than engineers was hired.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
517@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than does Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
518@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages as many programmers as does Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
519@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages more programmers than do Browne.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
520@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approves of Browne more than Browne of Abrams.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
521@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams approves of Browne as much as Browne of Abrams.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
522@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More programmers were interviewed than Abrams could hire.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
523@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@As many programmers were interviewed as Abrams could hire.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
524@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is a manager and Devito is a programmer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
525@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang and Devito work.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
526@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne, Chiang, and Devito work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
527@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne and Chiang and Devito work.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
528@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang, Devito work.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
529@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne and Chiang, Devito work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
530@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne, Chiang, Devito work.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
531@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is a manager but Devito is a programmer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
532@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang but Devito work.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
533@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne, Chiang, but Devito work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
534@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne but Chiang but Devito work.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
535@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang, Devito work.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
536@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne but Chiang, Devito work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
537@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both Chiang and Devito work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
538@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Chiang or Devito works.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
539@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither Chiang nor Devito works.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
540@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both Chiang or Devito works.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
541@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both Chiang or Devito work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
542@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Chiang and Devito works.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
543@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Chiang and Devito work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
544@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither Chiang or Devito works.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
545@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang nor Devito works.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
546@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired Devito, and Devito manages Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
547@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired Devito and manages Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
548@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired Devito and manage Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
549@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed, and Browne was hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
550@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed programmers, and Browne was hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
551@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviews programmers and is managed by Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
552@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed and was hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
553@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed by Browne and hired by Devito.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
554@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed and hired by Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
555@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed and hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
556@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang arrived and manages programmers.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
557@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang arrive and manages programmers.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
558@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang arrive and manage programmers.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
559@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang interviewed programmers and showed Browne an office.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
560@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed Browne an office and interviewed programmers.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
561@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang arrived and showed Browne an office.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
562@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired and manages Devito.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
563@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired and manage Devito.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
564@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito works for Devito and with Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
565@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito works for and with Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
566@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An old and trustworthy employee manages Devito.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
567@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An old and trustworthy employee manage Devito.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
568@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is old and trustworthy.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
569@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers and programmers are employees.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
570@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito manages a programmer who Abrams interviewed and Browne hired.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
571@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito manages a programmer Abrams interviewed and Browne hired.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
572@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is the manager who interviewed Abrams and hired Browne.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
573@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hired a programmer who Abrams interviewed and arrives.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
574@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito manages a programmer interviewed by Abrams and hired by Browne.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
575@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito manages a programmer Abrams interviewed and hired by Browne.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
576@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito manages a programmer interviewed by Abrams and who arrived.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
577@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito interviewed a programmer and an engineer who know each other.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
578@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams interview a programmer and did Browne hire an engineer?@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
579@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams interview a programmer and Browne hire an engineer?@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
580@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams interview a programmer and hire an engineer?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
581@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did or will Abrams interview Browne?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
582@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did or is Abrams interview Browne?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
583@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did or is Abrams interviewing Browne?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
584@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Abrams interview and who did Browne hire?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
585@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Abrams interview and Browne hire?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
586@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Abrams interview and did Browne hire?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
587@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was interviewed by Abrams and hired by Browne?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
588@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was Abrams interviewing and hired by Browne?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
589@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is a manager and trustworthy.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
590@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is a programmer and in Chiang's department.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
591@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is in Chiang's department and trustworthy.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
592@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was an applicant and interviewed by Devito.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
593@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was neither competent nor hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
594@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is in the office and interviewing an applicant.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
595@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito became a manager and trustworthy.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
596@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang became a programmer and in Devito's department.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
597@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito manage and Chiang work for?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
598@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito manage and Chiang works for?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
599@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito manages and Chiang work for?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
600@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito manages and Chiang works for?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
601@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito manage Browne and Chiang work for?@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
602@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was Abrams interviewed by and hired by?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
603@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who was Abrams interviewed by Browne and hired by?@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
604@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito manage and Chiang arrive?@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
605@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is the manager with whom and for whom Chiang works.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
606@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is the manager with whom and for Browne Chiang works.@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
607@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department and which project does Chiang work in?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
608@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department and which project do Chiang work in?@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
609@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which department and Devito's project does Chiang work in?@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
610@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito and Chiang works.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
611@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both Chiang and Devito works.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
612@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Chiang or Devito work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
613@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither Devito nor Chiang work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
614@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Devito or the programmers arrive.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
615@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Devito or the programmers arrives.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
616@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either the programmers or Devito arrives.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
617@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either the programmers or Devito arrive.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
618@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither Devito nor the programmers arrive.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
619@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither Devito nor the programmers arrives.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
620@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither the programmers nor Devito arrives.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
621@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither the programmers nor Devito arrive.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
622@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager and the programmer evaluated themselves.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
623@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You and the manager evaluated yourselves.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
624@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager and I evaluated ourselves.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
625@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You and I evaluated ourselves.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
626@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You and the manager evaluated themselves.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
627@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager and I evaluated themselves.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
628@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You and I evaluated yourselves.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
629@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang bet Devito a dollar that Browne interviewed Abrams and Browne a dollar that Abrams would be hired.@@@@1@18@@oe@8-sep-1999
630@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang bet Devito a dollar that Browne interviewed Abrams and a dollar that Abrams would be hired.@@@@1@17@@oe@8-sep-1999
631@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang bet Devito five dollars and Browne ten dollars that Abrams would be hired.@@@@1@14@@oe@8-sep-1999
632@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne worked for Abrams on Monday and Devito on Tuesday.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
633@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito knew that he had hired a programmer.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
634@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager evaluated her staff.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
635@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Her manager interviewed Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
636@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person who manages him knows that Browne is competent.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
637@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito interviewed programmers. He hired Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
638@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne evaluated himself.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
639@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers evaluated each other.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
640@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers evaluated each other's projects.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
641@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed the applicant himself.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
642@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams himself interviewed the applicant.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
643@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed himself the applicant.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
644@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne evaluated him.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
645@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I evaluated me.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
646@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@We evaluated us.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
647@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I evaluated us.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
648@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@We evaluated me.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
649@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She evaluated her.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
650@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You evaluated you.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
651@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager evaluated the members of the department.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
652@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I evaluated Abrams and me.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
653@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I evaluated Abrams and myself.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
654@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I evaluated myself and Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
655@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I evaluated me and Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
656@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every manager who interviewed a programmer hired him.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
657@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If a programmer was interviewed by every manager, he was hired.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
658@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every engineer who has a bookcase arrived.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
659@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The engineer who has a bookcase arrived.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
660@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is in the office.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
661@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Show the ones that have been hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
662@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The trustworthy consultants are programmers. The competent ones are engineers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
663@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@This consultant is older than that one.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
664@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works in the consultants' office, and interviewed Browne in that location.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
665@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was interviewed by Devito, who knew that the applicant was not trustworthy.@@@@1@13@@oe@8-sep-1999
666@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager who evaluated his programmers is more competent than the one who had consultants evaluate them.@@@@1@17@@oe@8-sep-1999
667@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A woman who works in his department was interviewed by a manager who hired her.@@@@1@15@@oe@8-sep-1999
668@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams didn't hire a programmer, Browne did.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
669@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams couldn't have been leaving, Browne could have been.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
670@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams couldn't have been leaving, Browne could have.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
671@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams couldn't have been leaving, Browne could.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
672@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams couldn't have been leaving, Browne did.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
673@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams couldn't work, Browne could have been.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
674@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams was interviewed by Browne, Chiang might have been.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
675@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams was interviewed by Browne, Chiang might have.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
676@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewing programmers, and Browne was, too.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
677@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewing programmers, and so was Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
678@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewing programmers, or Browne was.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
679@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Abrams was interviewing programmers, or Browne was.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
680@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Abrams was interviewing programmers, or so was Browne.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
681@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, and Browne was.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
682@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, but Browne was.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
683@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Abrams was interviewing programmers, but Browne was.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
684@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, nor was Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
685@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, and neither was Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
686@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, but neither was Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
687@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, and Browne wasn't either.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
688@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, and Browne wasn't, too.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
689@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, and so wasn't Browne.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
690@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, and so was Browne.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
691@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't interviewing programmers, but Browne wasn't.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
692@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewing programmers, and neither was Browne.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
693@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewing programmers, nor was Browne.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
694@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If there should be a consultant interviewing programmers, there will be.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
695@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If there should be a consultant interviewing programmers, there is.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
696@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If there should be a consultant interviewing programmers, there are.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
697@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If a consultant should be interviewing programmers, there will be.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
698@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If managers are not interviewing programmers, a consultant is.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
699@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If managers are not interviewing programmers, a consultant are.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
700@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams didn't, Browne hired a programmer.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
701@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Abrams was, Browne might have been interviewed by Chiang.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
702@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If there should be, there will be a consultant interviewing programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
703@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams wasn't, and Browne was interviewing programmers.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
704@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@So was Abrams, and Browne was interviewing programmers.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
705@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If there should be, a consultant will be interviewing programmers.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
706@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If managers are not, a consultant is interviewing programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
707@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If managers is not, a consultant are interviewing programmers.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
708@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer. Browne didn't.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
709@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne will hire a programmer or he will hire an engineer. And when he does, he will be a manager.@@@@1@20@@oe@8-sep-1999
710@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne will hire a consultant, but he doesn't know when.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
711@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Although he doesn't know when, Browne will hire a consultant.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
712@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne managed to interview the programmer.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
713@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When?@@@@1@1@@oe@8-sep-1999
714@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The programmer that Chiang interviewed was Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
715@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When?@@@@1@1@@oe@8-sep-1999
716@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne wasn't interviewed by Devito, but he was by Chiang.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
717@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams doesn't consult for Browne, but he does for Chiang.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
718@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne showed the office to Abrams on Monday and Chiang on Tuesday.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
719@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne should have interviewed a programmer, but he failed.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
720@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He should have interviewed a programmer every day. When did he fail?@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
721@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently Chiang works.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
722@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang evidently works.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
723@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang works, evidently.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
724@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently Chiang does not work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
725@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang evidently does not work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
726@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang does evidently not work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
727@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang does not evidently work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
728@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang does not work, evidently.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
729@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang has evidently been leaving.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
730@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently Chiang hired Devito.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
731@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang evidently hired Devito.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
732@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired evidently Devito@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
733@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired Devito, evidently.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
734@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently Chiang showed Devito an office.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
735@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang evidently showed Devito an office.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
736@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed evidently Devito an office.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
737@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed Devito evidently an office.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
738@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed Devito an office, evidently.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
739@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently Chiang showed an office to Devito.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
740@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang evidently showed an office to Devito.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
741@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed evidently an office to Devito.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
742@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed an office evidently to Devito.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
743@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang showed an office to Devito, evidently.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
744@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently there is a consultant on a project.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
745@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There evidently is a consultant on a project.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
746@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is evidently a consultant on a project.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
747@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is a consultant evidently on a project.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
748@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is a consultant on a project, evidently.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
749@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently Abrams was hired by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
750@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams evidently was hired by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
751@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was evidently hired by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
752@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was hired, evidently, by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
753@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was hired by Browne, evidently.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
754@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was hired by, evidently, Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
755@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently, did Abrams hire Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
756@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did evidently Abrams hire Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
757@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams evidently hire Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
758@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams hire Browne, evidently?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
759@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Evidently, who did Abrams hire?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
760@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who, evidently, did Abrams hire?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
761@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did evidently Abrams hire?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
762@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Abrams evidently hire?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
763@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Abrams hire, evidently?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
764@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed an engineer who evidently arrived.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
765@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed an engineer evidently who arrived.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
766@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed an engineer who Browne evidently hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
767@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed an engineer who evidently Browne hired.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
768@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Competently Abrams works.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
769@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams competently works.@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
770@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works competently.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
771@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams does not work competently.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
772@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has competently been working.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
773@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages Chiang competently.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
774@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed Chiang an office competently.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
775@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed an office to Chiang competently.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
776@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams showed an office to Chiang competently.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
777@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Competently Abrams is managed by Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
778@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams competently is managed by Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
779@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is competently managed by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
780@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is managed competently by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
781@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is managed by Browne competently.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
782@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is managed by competently Browne.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
783@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Competently, does Abrams manage Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
784@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does competently Abrams manage Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
785@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams competently manage Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
786@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Abrams manage Browne competently?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
787@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Competently, who does Abrams manage?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
788@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who, competently, does Abrams manage?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
789@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does competently Abrams manage?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
790@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Abrams competently manage?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
791@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Abrams manage competently?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
792@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed an engineer who Browne competently manages.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
793@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed an engineer who competently Browne manages.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
794@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne merely works.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
795@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne merely doesn't work.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
796@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne doesn't merely work.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
797@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne does merely not work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
798@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne has merely been interviewed.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
799@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Merely Browne has been interviewed.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
800@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne merely has been interviewed.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
801@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne has been interviewed merely.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
802@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne has been interviewed, merely.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
803@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne has merely hired a programmer.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
804@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Merely, did Browne hire a programmer?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
805@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did merely Browne hire a programmer?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
806@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Browne merely hire a programmer?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
807@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Browne hire a programmer, merely?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
808@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who merely did Browne hire?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
809@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did merely Browne hire?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
810@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Browne merely hire?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
811@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who did Browne hire, merely?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
812@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne hired an engineer who Abrams merely interviewed.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
813@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne hired an engineer who merely interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
814@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne hired an engineer who merely Abrams interviewed.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
815@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne's belief that Abrams hired Devito is true.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
816@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers of the projects are trustworthy.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
817@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The consultants to the managers were hired by Abrams.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
818@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The bookcase in Browne's office is old.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
819@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Anyone with an office works.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
820@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The programmer who was hired by Abrams manages the project.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
821@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages the project that has consultants.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
822@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams manages the project has consultants.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
823@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The programmer was hired by Abrams manages the project.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
824@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The programmer whom Browne hired manages the project.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
825@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works on the project that Browne manages.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
826@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works on the project Browne manages.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
827@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is a department manager.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
828@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne interviewed CSLI engineers.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
829@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works for department CSLI.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
830@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed a CSLI department manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
831@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works for a competent manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
832@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Two competent programmers were hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
833@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne's heavy bookcase is in Devito's office.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
834@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne hired a competent programmer who Abrams interviewed.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
835@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is a competent trustworthy manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
836@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is a good at interviews manager.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
837@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project's engineers work for Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
838@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams's engineers were interviewed by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
839@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams' engineers were interviewed by Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
840@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@None of the consultants work for Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
841@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@None of the consultants works for Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
842@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Five of the seven consultants work for Abrams.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
843@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Five consultants work for Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
844@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Any five of the seven consultants can work for Abrams.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
845@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Most of the staff is competent.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
846@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Most of the program works.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
847@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Almost all of the program works.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
848@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Five teams of programmers were hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
849@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Half of the programmers were interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
850@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Half the programmers were interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
851@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne is the manager.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
852@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Lee Browne is the manager.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
853@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Mr. Browne is the manager.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
854@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Mr. Lee Browne is the manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
855@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A Mr. Lee Browne is the manager.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
856@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A Lee Browne is the manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
857@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Lee Browne, Esq is the manager.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
858@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed Browne on Mon.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
859@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works for CSLI.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
860@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was hired on 1/3/84.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
861@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was hired on the 1st of January, 1984.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
862@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was hired on January 1st, 1984.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
863@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne was hired on 1-3-84.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
864@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed Browne in Paris.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
865@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed Browne in Paris, France.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
866@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Managers interviewed programmers in Paris, France and Palo Alto.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
867@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The seven programmers were hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
868@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The first programmer was hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
869@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@All seven programmers were hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
870@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The first seven programmers were hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
871@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
872@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Seven programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
873@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@First programmer was hired.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
874@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
875@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every programmers were hired.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
876@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@All programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
877@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@All programmer was hired.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
878@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@An engineer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
879@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
880@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
881@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@This programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
882@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@These programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
883@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@That programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
884@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Those programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
885@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Some programmer was hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
886@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Some programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
887@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Any programmer was hired.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
888@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Any programmers were hired.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
889@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Most programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
890@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Few programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
891@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@No programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
892@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Many programmers were hired.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
893@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A dozen programmers were hired.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
894@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@All but seven programmers were hired.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
895@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Fewer than half the programmers were hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
896@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Fewer than half of the programmers were hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
897@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A number of programmers were interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
898@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A number of programmers was interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
899@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More managers than programmers were interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
900@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@More managers were interviewed.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
901@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Fewer managers than programmers were interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
902@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Neither managers nor programmers were interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
903@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both managers and programmers were interviewed.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
904@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Only the more competent programmers were interviewed.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
905@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It appears that Chiang interviewed Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
906@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It appears true that Chiang interviewed Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
907@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams denies it that Chiang arrived.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
908@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is known that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
909@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang knows it that Abrams hired Browne.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
910@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How many managers are there of projects?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
911@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A programmer was hired who Abrams interviewed.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
912@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Hire a programmer!@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
913@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Be trustworthy!@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
914@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Are trustworthy!@@@@0@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
915@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do not hire a programmer!@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
916@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Don't hire a programmer!@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
917@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do not be trustworthy!@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
918@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Be not trustworthy!@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
919@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You hire a programmer!@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
920@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You be trustworthy!@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
921@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Don't you hire a programmer!@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
922@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Don't you be trustworthy!@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
923@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do not you hire a programmer!@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
924@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do you not hire a programmer!@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
925@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do not you be trustworthy!@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
926@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do you not be trustworthy!@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
927@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Everyone hire a programmer!@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
928@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Everyone be trustworthy!@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
929@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Don't anyone hire a programmer!@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
930@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Don't anyone be trustworthy!@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
931@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do not anyone hire a programmer!@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
932@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do anyone not hire a programmer!@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
933@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do not anyone be trustworthy!@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
934@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Do anyone not be trustworthy!@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
935@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is hard to work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
936@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is hard for programmers to work.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
937@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is hard to interview programmers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
938@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is hard for managers to interview programmers.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
939@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is hard for managers for engineers to interview programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
940@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers are hard to interview.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
941@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers are hard to interview engineers.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
942@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers is hard to interview.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
943@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers are hard for engineers to interview.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
944@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers are hard for managers for engineers to interview.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
945@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was hard to show an office to Chiang.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
946@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang was hard to show an office to.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
947@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Offices are hard to show to Chiang.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
948@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang was hard for Abrams to show an office to.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
949@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Offices are hard for Abrams to show to Chiang.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
950@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was hard to show Chiang an office.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
951@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang was hard to show an office.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
952@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Offices are hard to show Chiang.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
953@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang was hard for Abrams to show an office.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
954@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Offices are hard for Abrams to show Chiang.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
955@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers are a bitch for managers to interview.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
956@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers are a bitch to interview.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
957@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is a bitch for managers to interview programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
958@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is a bitch to interview programmers.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
959@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The bookcase is heavy for the engineers to move.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
960@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The bookcase is heavy to move.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
961@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is heavy for the engineers to move the bookcase.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
962@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is heavy to move the bookcase.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
963@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is too old for the manager to hire.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
964@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is too old to hire.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
965@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is old enough for the manager to hire.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
966@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is old enough to hire.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
967@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is too old for the manager to hire Chiang.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
968@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is too old to hire Chiang.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
969@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is old enough for the manager to hire Chiang.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
970@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is old enough to hire Chiang.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
971@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was Browne who managed the project.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
972@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is Browne who managed the project.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
973@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was themselves the staff had evaluated.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
974@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was in January that Browne was hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
975@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is in January that Browne was hired.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
976@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was BROWNE's manager who interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
977@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It was BROWNE whose manager interviewed Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
978@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What Devito works on is Browne's project.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
979@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@What is managed by Abrams is Browne's project.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
980@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The one Devito hired was Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
981@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne didn't hire five engineers.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
982@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams didn't interview many programmers.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
983@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Many programmers weren't interviewed by Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
984@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Many managers didn't interview Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
985@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne wasn't interviewed by many managers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
986@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every manager interviewed one of the programmers.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
987@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Two programmers were interviewed by every manager.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
988@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List one consultant on every project.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
989@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who manages every project?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
990@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which programmers did every manager interview?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
991@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which managers interviewed every programmer?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
992@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Three engineers manage a project.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
993@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams competently interviewed many programmers.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
994@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams doesn't interview programmers often.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
995@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A project that every manager works on is managed by Abrams.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
996@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every project that a consultant works on is managed by Abrams.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
997@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@That many managers had interviewed Abrams was known by two programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
998@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The fact that many managers had interviewed Abrams was known by two programmers.@@@@1@13@@oe@8-sep-1999
999@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every manager interviewed one of the programmers.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1000@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One of the managers interviewed every programmer.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1001@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every programmer was interviewed by one of the managers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1002@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One of the programmers was interviewed by every manager.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1003@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One manager interviewed each programmer.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1004@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One programmer was interviewed by each manager.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1005@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One manager interviewed every programmer.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1006@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@One programmer was interviewed by every manager.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1007@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every manager interviewed a programmer who had worked on a project with Abrams.@@@@1@13@@oe@8-sep-1999
1008@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every programmer was interviewed by a manager who had worked on a project with Abrams.@@@@1@15@@oe@8-sep-1999
1009@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed a consultant on every project.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1010@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@List the manager of every consultant.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1011@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Every manager interviewed many programmers, but Abrams didn't.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1012@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hires Browne, then the project will have three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1013@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hires Browne, the project will have three programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1014@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito does not hire Browne, the project will have three programmers.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1015@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hires Browne, the project will not have three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1016@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito does not hire Browne, the project will not have three programmers.@@@@1@13@@oe@8-sep-1999
1017@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project will have three programmers if Devito hires Browne.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1018@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Should Devito hire Browne, the project would have three programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1019@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Should Devito not hire Browne, the project would have three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1020@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Shouldn't Devito hire Browne, the project would have three programmers.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1021@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project would have three programmers, should Devito hire Browne.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1022@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project would have three programmers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1023@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hired Browne, then the project had three programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1024@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hired Browne, the project had three programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1025@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hired Browne, then the project would have had three programmers.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1026@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hired Browne, the project would have had three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1027@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hired Browne, then the project would have three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1028@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito hired Browne, the project would have three programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1029@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito will hire Browne, the project will have three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1030@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If the project will be managed by an engineer, Browne will hire a programmer.@@@@0@14@@oe@8-sep-1999
1031@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito had hired Browne, the project would have had three programmers.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1032@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project would have had three programmers, if Devito had hired Browne.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1033@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If Devito had hired Browne, would the project have had three programmers?@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1034@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Would the project have had three programmers, if Devito had hired Browne?@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1035@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who would Devito have hired, if the project had had three programmers?@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1036@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@If the project had had three programmers, who would have hired Devito?@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1037@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Had Devito hired Browne, the project would have had three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1038@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Had Devito not hired Browne, the project would have had three programmers.@@@@1@12@@oe@8-sep-1999
1039@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Hadn't Devito hired Browne, the project would have had three programmers.@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1040@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Had Devito hired Browne, would the project have had three programmers?@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1041@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project would have had three programmers, had Devito hired Browne.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1042@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who would Devito have hired, had the project had three programmers.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1043@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hires Browne and the project has three programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1044@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does Devito hire Browne and the project has three programmers?@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1045@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hires Browne and does the project have three programmers?@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1046@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Devito hires Browne, or the project has two programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1047@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hires Browne, or the project has two programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1048@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hires Browne, or does the project have two programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1049@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Who does Devito hire, or the project has two programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1050@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Browne hires Abrams or the project has two programmers.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1051@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Either Browne hires Abrams or does the project have two programmers?@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1052@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Does either Browne hire Abrams or the project has two programmers?@@@@0@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1053@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne hires Abrams or the project has two programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1054@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You hire Chiang, and the project has three programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1055@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Hire Chiang, and the project has three programmers.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1056@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito has not hired Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1057@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito could not hire Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1058@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is not hiring Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1059@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito could not have hired Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1060@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito could not be hiring Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1061@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito has not been interviewing programmers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1062@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito could not have been interviewing programmers.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1063@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito did not hire Abrams.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1064@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hired not Abrams@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1065@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is not a manager.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1066@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito is not Abrams.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1067@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is not a programmer working for Abrams.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1068@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams need not hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1069@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams ought not to hire Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1070@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams ought not hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1071@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams not hire Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1072@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has Abrams not hired Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1073@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is Abrams not hiring Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1074@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could Abrams not have been interviewing programmers?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1075@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did Abrams not hire Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1076@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Need Abrams not hire Browne?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1077@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Could not Abrams hire Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1078@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Has not Abrams hired Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1079@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Is not Abrams hiring Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1080@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Did not Abrams hire Browne?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1081@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams cannot hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1082@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams can't hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1083@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hasn't hired Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1084@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams isn't hiring Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1085@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams didn't hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1086@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I aren't a consultant.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1087@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Aren't I a consultant?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1088@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Can't Abrams hire Browne?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1089@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Hasn't Abrams hired Browne?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1090@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Isn't Abrams hiring Browne?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1091@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Didn't Abrams hire Browne?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1092@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I amn't a consultant.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1093@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams won't hire Browne.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1094@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams willn't hire Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1095@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito could have not hired Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1096@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito has been not interviewing programmers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1097@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito urged Abrams not to hire Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1098@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito urged Abrams to not hire Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1099@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams couldn't not hire Browne.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1100@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hired not Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1101@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito hired a not competent programmer.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1102@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Not Devito hired Browne.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1103@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito appears not competent.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1104@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Not one programmer did Chiang interview.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1105@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Not every manager interviewed programmers.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1106@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Not many programmers were interviewed by Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1107@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Programmers were interviewed by not every managers.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1108@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne interviewed not many programmers.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1109@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He worked.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1110@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He was working.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1111@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He had worked.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1112@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He had been working.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1113@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He works.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1114@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He is working.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1115@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He has worked.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1116@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He has been working.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1117@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He will work.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1118@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He will be working.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1119@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He will have worked.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1120@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He will have been working.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1121@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He'll work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1122@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He's working.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1123@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When's he working?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1124@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He's worked.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1125@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He'd worked.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1126@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams will interview Browne in an hour.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1127@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams has been interviewing Browne for an hour.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1128@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams will interview for ever.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1129@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviews Browne often.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1130@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviewed Browne twice.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1131@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams interviews Browne three times a day.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1132@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams will interview Browne by Monday.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1133@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams will interview Browne by Monday.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1134@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager knows that Abrams arrived.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1135@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager is knowing that Abrams arrived.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1136@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is an employee.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1137@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang is being an employee.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1138@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Browne manages the project.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1139@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams works on the project.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1140@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang evaluated Abrams.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1141@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1142@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer when Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1143@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer until Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1144@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer before Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1145@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer as Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1146@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer after Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1147@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer as soon as Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1148@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer whenever Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1149@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer while Devito interviewed an engineer.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1150@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer until Devito's interview.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1151@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer before Devito's interview.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1152@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer after Devito's interview.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1153@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams hired a programmer during Devito's interview.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1154@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He promised that he would interview a programmer now.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1155@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He promised that he would interview a programmer then.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1156@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@When did Abrams interview a programmer?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1157@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How often does Abrams interview a programmer?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1158@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@How many hours was Abrams interviewing a programmer?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1159@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She worked.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1160@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She knew she had worked.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1161@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He works.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1162@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He knew he worked.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1163@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She'll work.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1164@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@She knew she'd work.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1165@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers finished working.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1166@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers finished to work.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1167@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers ceased working.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1168@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers ceased to work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1169@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers continued working.@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1170@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The managers continued to work.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1171@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams is going to interview Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1172@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager often used to interview programmers.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1173@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager would often interview programmers.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1174@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He was working.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1175@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He was evaluating a programmer.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1176@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He hired a programmer for an hour.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1177@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He hired a programmer in an hour.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1178@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He worked for an hour.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1179@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He worked in an hour.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1180@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He finished at noon on Tuesday, July 15, 1986, before Abrams hired Browne.@@@@1@13@@oe@8-sep-1999
1181@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He is interviewing programmers now.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1182@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He is interviewing programmers often.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1183@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He has worked for Abrams for several months.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1184@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams will move bookcases before he will interview programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1185@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He'll be interviewing programmers now.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1186@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager at that time was Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1187@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The former manager was Chiang.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1188@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The previously interviewed programmer was Abrams.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1189@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1190@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Abrams was interviewed by Browne.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1191@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He was hired.@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1192@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both competent and trustworthy, Chiang will interview Devito.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1193@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Both competent and trustworthy, Devito will be hired.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1194@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Without a manager, no project has a consultant.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1195@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Without an interview, no programmer is hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1196@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A competent programmer, Devito works for Abrams.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1197@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A competent programmer, Devito will be hired.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1198@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Having interviewed three programmers, Devito hired Browne.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1199@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Having been interviewed by three managers, Devito was hired.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1200@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Hired without an interview, Devito became a manager.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1201@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Its manager being an engineer, the project has no consultants.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1202@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@His project managed by Chiang, Devito works for an engineer.@@@@1@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1203@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager worked after interviewing Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1204@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager interviewed Browne after working.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1205@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager will hire a programmer after interviewing Browne.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1206@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager showed an office to Browne after interviewing a programmer.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1207@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager interviewed a programmer after showing an office to Browne.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1208@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager will show Browne an office after interviewing a programmer.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1209@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The manager will hire a programmer after showing Browne an office.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1210@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@A consultant is evaluated by interviewing the manager.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1211@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Without knowing who interviewed him, it is hard to evaluate Devito.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1212@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Without interviewing them, it is hard to hire programmers.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1213@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito has Browne to interview.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1214@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito interviewed Browne to evaluate him.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1215@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Devito interviewed Browne in order to evaluate him.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1216@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@In order to evaluate him, Devito interviewed Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1217@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@To evaluate him, Devito interviewed Browne.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1218@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The project hired so many programmers that it became a department.@@@@1@11@@oe@8-sep-1999
1219@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang, who is the department manager, hired Devito.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1220@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired Devito, who is a programmer.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1221@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang hired Devito, which was known by Browne.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1222@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang, and she is competent, hired Devito.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1223@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang - she's the manager of the department - hired Devito.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1224@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang said,@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1225@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Chiang said.@@@@1@2@@oe@8-sep-1999
1226@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, didn't she?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1227@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, didn't Sara?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1228@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, didn't he?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1229@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, didn't they?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1230@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, didn't I?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1231@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, didn't?@@@@0@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1232@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@My mother slept, didn't she?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1233@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@My mother slept, didn't her?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1234@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@My mother slept, didn't herself?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1235@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@My mother slept, didn't mine?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1236@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Mine slept, didn't mine?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1237@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is raining, isn't it?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1238@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is a meeting, isn't there?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1239@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is raining, isn't there?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1240@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There is a meeting, isn't it?@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1241@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It is raining, isn't he?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1242@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara is sleeping, isn't she?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1243@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara is sleeping, isn't there?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1244@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara is sleeping, isn't it?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1245@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara will sleep, won't she?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1246@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara will sleep, can't she?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1247@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara will sleep, doesn't she?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1248@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara sleeps, doesn't she?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1249@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara sleeps, didn't she?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1250@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara sleeps, won't she?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1251@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara sleeps, slept she?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1252@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara will sleep, won't she?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1253@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Will Sara sleep, won't she?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1254@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Everyone slept, didn't they?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1255@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Everyone is Sara, aren't they?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1256@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Everyone is here, aren't they?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1257@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara didn't sleep, did she?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1258@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, did she?@@@@1@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1259@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara didn't sleep, didn't she?@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1260@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara ate and ran, didn't she?@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1261@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara sleeps, didn't she?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1262@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sara slept, doesn't she?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1263@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are five people in the room, aren't there?@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1264@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@There are five people in the room, isn't there?@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1265@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sleep, won't you?@@@@1@3@@oe@8-sep-1999
1266@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I am sleeping, aren't I?@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1267@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You better not be late.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1268@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@You better not be late, better you?@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1269@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I suppose Sara will win, won't she?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1270@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I believe Sara will win, won't she?@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1271@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@I suppose Sara will win, don't I?@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1272@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Bob knows that Sara will sleep, doesn't he?@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1273@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows that Sara will sleep, won't she?@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1274@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@He walks, don't they?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1275@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@It walks, don't they?@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1276@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether Sandy sleeps.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1277@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether Sandy slept.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1278@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether to sleep.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1279@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1280@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether for Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1281@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows what to like.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1282@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows what Sandy to like.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1283@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows what for Sandy to like.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1284@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows when to sleep.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1285@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows when Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1286@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows when for Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1287@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows what to think Sandy likes.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1288@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows by whom to think Sandy was hired.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1289@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows who to think Sandy was hired by.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1290@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows by whom Abrams to think Sandy was hired.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1291@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows Abrams by whom to think Sandy was hired.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1292@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows who Abrams to think Sandy was hired by.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1293@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows Abrams who to think Sandy was hired by.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1294@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows by whom to think Sandy hired.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1295@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows if Sandy slept.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1296@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows if Sandy sleeps.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1297@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows if Sandy sleep.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1298@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows if sleep.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1299@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether sleep.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1300@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether whether to sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1301@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether does Sandy sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1302@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether what Sandy likes.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1303@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim knows whether what does Sandy like.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1304@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether Sandy sleeps.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1305@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether Sandy slept.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1306@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether to sleep.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1307@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1308@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether for Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1309@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders what to like.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1310@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders what Sandy to like.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1311@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders what for Sandy to like.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1312@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders when to sleep.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1313@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders when Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1314@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders when for Sandy to sleep.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1315@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wondered what to think Sandy likes.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1316@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wondered by whom to think Sandy was hired.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1317@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders who to think Sandy was hired by.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1318@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders by whom Abrams to think Sandy was hired.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1319@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders Abrams by whom to think Sandy was hired.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1320@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders who Abrams to think Sandy was hired by.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1321@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders Abrams who to think Sandy was hired by.@@@@0@10@@oe@8-sep-1999
1322@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wondered by whom to think Sandy hired.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1323@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders if Sandy slept.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1324@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders if Sandy sleeps.@@@@1@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1325@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders if Sandy sleep.@@@@0@5@@oe@8-sep-1999
1326@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders if sleep.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1327@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether sleep.@@@@0@4@@oe@8-sep-1999
1328@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether whether to sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1329@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether does Sandy sleep.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1330@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether what Sandy likes.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1331@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim wonders whether what does Sandy like.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1332@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to sleep is Sandy.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1333@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to talk to is Sandy.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1334@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Kim the person to talk to is Sandy.@@@@0@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1335@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Which person the person to talk to is Sandy.@@@@0@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1336@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sandy finds a person to talk to.@@@@1@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1337@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sandy found a person to sleep.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1338@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@Sandy found a person to slept.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1339@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to slept is Kim.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1340@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to wonder if Kim likes is Sandy.@@@@1@9@@oe@8-sep-1999
1341@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person Kim likes is Sandy.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1342@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person likes Kim is Sandy.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1343@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person Kim thinks likes Abrams is Sandy.@@@@1@8@@oe@8-sep-1999
1344@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to sleeps is Kim.@@@@0@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1345@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to talks to is Kim.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1346@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to talked to is Kim.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999
1347@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person to know is Kim.@@@@1@6@@oe@8-sep-1999
1348@CSLI@formal@none@1@S@The person whether to know is Kim.@@@@0@7@@oe@8-sep-1999