WHAT THEY SAID: No tears for Tobin, but some for al-Qaeda Author: Jane Taber OTTAWA - The plight of prisoners and politicians has been weighing heavily on the minds of editorial writers and pundits in and around the nation's capital. It's been a week now since Jean Chretien's Cabinet shuffle and the dramatic departure of Brian Tobin -- seven days during which the print pundits have had time to ponder his actions. And what they have said about him has not been pretty. Still, before discussing the antics of Mr. Tobin and the elevation of Ottawa's John Manley to the status of golden boy, there is the controversial, and more pressing, matter of the plight of the al-Qaeda fighters imprisoned at a U.S. military base in Cuba. "Even thugs deserve humane treatment," reads the headline of the Ottawa Citizen editorial. "Conditions for detainees in Guantanamo Bay are harsh: wire-mesh cells 2.4 by 1.8 metres, a sleeping mat and blanket, a bucket for a toilet," writes the Citizen. "But that doesn't necessarily make them inhumane. On the other hand, U.S. assurances that it's treating the prisoners humanely don't mean that's so." The Citizen argues that Canada should "insist" the United States "allow a 'competent tribunal' to decide the legal status of the detainees, as required by the Geneva Convention. ... That might make it more difficult to find Osama bin Laden and his remaining thugs. But laws keep us from behaving like them." The Sudbury Star agrees: "This conflict must now move to its next stage. A tribunal, formed by the United Nations, must address the issue of these captured fighters and determine how they will be dealt with." Editorial writers at The Daily Press in Timmins disagree. In an editorial appearing this week, the newspaper is unequivocal in its U.S. support. "We can't help but wonder if some politicians and civil rights advocates are overreacting when it comes to the treatment of captured al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters by the United States. "For the U.S. military to treat the prisoners any differently might very well imperil American lives," reads the editorial. "If Osama bin Laden is still alive, we suspect he is giving the civil rights advocates a hearty thumbs up." No one, however, is giving a hearty thumbs up to Mr. Tobin. Rather, his sudden departure from politics provoked much criticism. "No tears will be shed in this corner since Brian Tobin's departure represents his third consecutive betrayal of voters," Walter Robinson, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and a regular columnist in The Ottawa Sun wrote yesterday. "Mr. Tobin seems content to be back home on the Rock playing with his bag of marbles and collecting his parliamentary pension." In the Citizen, columnist Rosa Harris-Adler wrote a devastatingly sarcastic piece, ridiculing Mr. Tobin's assertion that he was leaving for family reasons. She chronicles what she imagines his first week post-politics would have been like: "Day One: Brian decides it's finally time to learn how to diaper the baby. With some effort, he pins the flailing child down on the changing table only to discover there are no diapers in the house. Brian gives up in confusion." By Day Seven, however, Ms. Harris-Adler notes that though Mr. Tobin has finally mastered the diapering process, his "baby" who is 15 years old is "not amused." And Michel Vastel, a columnist in Le Droit, writes a goodbye to his "favourite Newfie." He says that Mr. Tobin walked on too many toes, and made too many enemies in Ottawa. He also wrote that while the former minister may have been one of the longest-serving MPs, he was also one of the most "unstable," noting his career was like a "rough sea," with highs and lows and never calm. The vitriol continues. In The Kingston Whig-Standard Paul Schliesmann writes, "Canadians don't need the kind of politician Brian Tobin had become -- flighty, opportunistic and lacking in commitment to his job as a Member of Parliament." The pundits in Ottawa, it seems, have saved all of their praise for John Manley, the new Deputy Prime Minister and a hometown favourite. "[Mr. Manley] has proven to be a sensible manager who Canadians can trust," says a Sun editorial, observing that he emerged from the Sept. 11 crisis as a "sensible, serious voice in Cabinet." And the Citizen calls Mr. Manley "competent and scrupulously honest." "Mr. Manley's continuing responsibility for national security, along with the added clout he gains as Deputy Prime Minister, bodes well for the country." Copyright @ 2002 National Post Online |