Ontology (information science) {{Otheruses4|ontology in information science and computer science|the term in philosophy|ontology}} In both [[computer science]] and [[information science]], an '''ontology''' is a formal representation of a set of concepts within a [[Domain of discourse|domain]] and the relationships between those concepts. It is used to [[Reasoning|reason]] about the properties of that domain, and may be used to define the domain. Ontologies are used in [[artificial intelligence]], the [[Semantic Web]], [[software engineering]], [[biomedical informatics]], [[library science]], and [[information architecture]] as a form of [[knowledge representation]] about the world or some part of it. Common components of ontologies include: * Individuals: instances or objects (the basic or "ground level" objects) * [[Class]]es: [[set (computer science)|set]]s, collections, concepts or types of objectsSee [[Class (set theory)]], [[Class (computer science)]], and [[Class (philosophy)]], each of which is relevant but not identical to the notion of a "class" here. * [[Attribute (computing)|Attribute]]s: properties, features, characteristics, or parameters that objects (and classes) can have * [[Relation (mathematics)|Relations]]: ways that classes and objects can be related to one another * Function terms: complex structures formed from certain relations that can be used in place of an individual term in a statement * Restrictions: formally stated descriptions of what must be true in order for some assertion to be accepted as input * Rules: statements in the form of an if-then (antecedent-consequent) sentence that describe the logical inferences that can be drawn from an assertion in a particular form * Axioms: assertions (including rules) in a logical form that together comprise the overall theory that the ontology describes in its domain of application. This definition differs from that of "axioms" in generative grammar and formal logic. In these disciplines, axioms include only statements asserted as ''a priori'' knowledge. As used here, "axioms" also include the theory derived from axiomatic statements. * [[Event (philosophy)|Events]]: the changing of attributes or relations Ontologies are commonly encoded using [[ontology language]]s. == Elements == Contemporary ontologies share many structural similarities, regardless of the language in which they are expressed. As mentioned above, most ontologies describe individuals (instances), classes (concepts), attributes, and relations. In this section each of these components is discussed in turn. === Individuals === Individuals (instances) are the basic, "ground level" components of an ontology. The individuals in an ontology may include concrete objects such as people, animals, tables, automobiles, molecules, and planets, as well as abstract individuals such as numbers and words. Strictly speaking, an ontology need not include any individuals, but one of the general purposes of an ontology is to provide a means of classifying individuals, even if those individuals are not explicitly part of the ontology. In formal extensional ontologies, only the utterances of words and numbers are considered individuals – the numbers and names themselves are classes. In a 4D ontology, an individual is identified by its spatio-temporal extent. Examples of formal extensional ontologies are [[ISO 15926]] and the model in development by the [[IDEAS Group]]. === Classes === Classes – concepts that are also called ''type'', ''sort'', ''category'', and ''kind'' – are abstract groups, sets, or collections of objects. They may contain individuals, other classes, or a combination of both. Some examples of classes:Note that the names given to the classes mentioned here are entirely a matter of convention. * ''Person'', the class of all people * ''Vehicle'', the class of all vehicles * ''Car'', the class of all cars * ''Class'', representing the class of all classes * ''Thing'', representing the class of all things Ontologies vary on whether classes can contain other classes, whether a class can belong to itself, whether there is a universal class (that is, a class containing everything), etc. Sometimes restrictions along these lines are made in order to avoid certain well-known [[paradox]]es. The classes of an ontology may be [[extensional]] or [[intensional]] in nature. A class is extensional if and only if it is characterized solely by its membership. More precisely, a class C is extensional if and only if for any class C', if C' has exactly the same members as C, then C and C' are identical. If a class does not satisfy this condition, then it is intensional. While extensional classes are more well-behaved and well-understood mathematically, as well as less problematic philosophically, they do not permit the fine grained distinctions that ontologies often need to make. For example, an ontology may want to distinguish between the class of all creatures with a kidney and the class of all creatures with a heart, even if these classes happen to have exactly the same members. In the upper ontologies mentioned above, the classes are defined intensionally. Intensionally defined classes usually have necessary conditions associated with membership in each class. Some classes may also have sufficient conditions, and in those cases the combination of necessary and sufficient conditions make that class a fully ''defined'' class. Importantly, a class can subsume or be subsumed by other classes; a class subsumed by another is called a ''subclass'' of the subsuming class. For example, ''Vehicle'' subsumes ''Car'', since (necessarily) anything that is a member of the latter class is a member of the former. The subsumption relation is used to create a hierarchy of classes, typically with a maximally general class like ''Thing'' at the top, and very specific classes like ''2002 Ford Explorer'' at the bottom. The critically important consequence of the subsumption relation is the inheritance of properties from the parent (subsuming) class to the child (subsumed) class. Thus, anything that is necessarily true of a parent class is also necessarily true of all of its subsumed child classes. In some ontologies, a class is only allowed to have one parent (''single inheritance''), but in most ontologies, classes are allowed to have any number of parents (''multiple inheritance''), and in the latter case all necessary properties of each parent are inherited by the subsumed child class. Thus a particular class of animal (''HouseCat'') may be a child of the class ''Cat'' and also a child of the class ''Pet''. [[Image:OntologyBasic.png|right|A partial ontology; The concept ''Car'' is partitioned into ''2-wheel'' and ''4-wheel'']] A partition is a set of related classes and associated rules that allow objects to be placed into the appropriate class. For example, to the right is the partial diagram of an ontology that has a partition of the ''Car'' class into the classes ''2-Wheel Drive'' and ''4-Wheel Drive''. The partition rule determines if a particular car is placed in the ''2-Wheel Drive'' or the ''4-Wheel Drive'' class. If the partition rule(s) guarantee that a single ''Car'' cannot be in both classes, then the partition is called a disjoint partition. If the partition rules ensure that every concrete object in the super-class is an instance of at least one of the partition classes, then the partition is called an exhaustive partition. === Attributes === Objects in the ontology can be described by assigning attributes to them. Each attribute has at least a name and a value, and is used to store information that is specific to the object it is attached to. For example the Ford Explorer object has attributes such as: * ''Name'': Ford Explorer * ''Number-of-doors'': 4 * ''Engine'': {4.0L, 4.6L} * ''Transmission'': 6-speed The value of an attribute can be a complex [[data type]]; in this example, the value of the attribute called ''Engine'' is a list of values, not just a single value. If you did not define attributes for the concepts you would have either a [[taxonomy]] (if [[hyponym]] relationships exist between concepts) or a '''controlled vocabulary'''. These are useful, but are not considered true ontologies. ===Relationships=== An important use of attributes is to describe the relationships (also known as relations) between objects in the ontology. Typically a relation is an attribute whose value is another object in the ontology. For example in the ontology that contains the Ford Explorer and the [[Ford Bronco]], the Ford Bronco object might have the following attribute: * ''Successor'': Ford Explorer This tells us that the Explorer is the model that replaced the Bronco. Much of the power of ontologies comes from the ability to describe these relations. Together, the set of relations describes the [[semantics]] of the domain. The most important type of relation is the [[subsumption]] relation (''is-[[superclass]]-of'', the converse of ''[[is-a]]'', ''is-subtype-of'' or ''is-[[subclass]]-of''). This defines which objects are members of classes of objects. For example we have already seen that the Ford Explorer ''is-a'' 4-wheel drive, which in turn ''is-a'' Car: [[Image:OntologyBronco.png|left]] The addition of the is-a relationships has created a hierarchical [[taxonomy]]; a tree-like structure (or, more generally, a [[partially ordered set]]) that clearly depicts how objects relate to one another. In such a structure, each object is the 'child' of a 'parent class' (Some languages restrict the is-a relationship to one parent for all nodes, but many do not). Another common type of relations is the [[meronymy]] relation, written as ''part-of'', that represents how objects combine together to form composite objects. For example, if we extended our example ontology to include objects like Steering Wheel, we would say that "Steering Wheel is-part-of Ford Explorer" since a steering wheel is one of the components of a Ford Explorer. If we introduce meronymy relationships to our ontology, we find that this simple and elegant tree structure quickly becomes complex and significantly more difficult to interpret manually. It is not difficult to understand why; an entity that is described as 'part of' another entity might also be 'part of' a third entity. Consequently, entities may have more than one parent. The structure that emerges is known as a [[directed acyclic graph]] (DAG). As well as the standard is-a and part-of relations, ontologies often include additional types of relation that further refine the semantics they model. These relations are often domain-specific and are used to answer particular types of question. For example in the domain of automobiles, we might define a ''made-in'' relationship which tells us where each car is built. So the Ford Explorer is ''made-in'' [[Louisville, Kentucky|Louisville]]. The ontology may also know that Louisville is-in [[Kentucky]] and Kentucky is-a state of the [[United States|USA]]. Software using this ontology could now answer a question like "which cars are made in the U.S.?" == Domain ontologies and upper ontologies == A domain ontology (or domain-specific ontology) models a specific domain, or part of the world. It represents the particular meanings of terms as they apply to that domain. For example the word ''[[card]]'' has many different meanings. An ontology about the domain of [[poker]] would model the "[[playing card]]" meaning of the word, while an ontology about the domain of [[computer hardware]] would model the "[[punch card]]" and "[[video card]]" meanings. An [[Upper ontology (computer science)|upper ontology]] (or foundation ontology) is a model of the common objects that are generally applicable across a wide range of domain ontologies. It contains a [[core glossary]] in whose terms objects in a set of domains can be described. There are several standardized upper ontologies available for use, including [[Dublin Core]], [[General Formal Ontology|GFO]], [[OpenCyc]]/[[ResearchCyc]], [[Suggested Upper Merged Ontology|SUMO]], and [http://www.loa-cnr.it/DOLCE.html DOLCE]l. [[WordNet]], while considered an upper ontology by some, is not an ontology: it is a unique combination of a [[taxonomy]] and a controlled vocabulary{{Fact|date=June 2008}} (see above, under Attributes). The [[Gellish]] ontology is an example of a combination of an upper and a domain ontology. Since domain ontologies represent concepts in very specific and often eclectic ways, they are often incompatible. As systems that rely on domain ontologies expand, they often need to merge domain ontologies into a more general representation. This presents a challenge to the ontology designer. Different ontologies in the same domain can also arise due to different perceptions of the domain based on cultural background, education, ideology, or because a different representation language was chosen. At present, merging ontologies is a largely manual process and therefore time-consuming and expensive. Using a foundation ontology to provide a common definition of core terms can make this process manageable. There are studies on generalized techniques for merging ontologies, but this area of research is still largely theoretical. == Ontology languages == An [[ontology language]] is a [[formal language]] used to encode the ontology. There are a number of such languages for ontologies, both proprietary and standards-based: * [[Web Ontology Language|OWL]] is a language for making ontological statements, developed as a follow-on from [[Resource Description Framework|RDF]] and [[RDFS]], as well as earlier ontology language projects including [[Ontology Inference Layer|OIL]], [[DARPA Agent Markup Language|DAML]] and [[DAMLplusOIL|DAML+OIL]]. OWL is intended to be used over the [[World Wide Web]], and all its elements (classes, properties and individuals) are defined as RDF [[resource (Web)|resources]], and identified by [[Uniform Resource Identifier|URI]]s. * [[KIF]] is a syntax for [[first-order logic]] that is based on [[S-expression]]s. * The [[Cyc]] project has its own ontology language called [[CycL]], based on [[first-order predicate calculus]] with some higher-order extensions. * [[Rule Interchange Format]] (RIF) and [[F-Logic]] combine ontologies and rules. * The [[Gellish]] language includes rules for its own extension and thus integrates an ontology with an ontology language. == Relation to the philosophical term == The term ''ontology'' has its origin in [[ontology|philosophy]], where it is the name of one fundamental branch of [[metaphysics]], concerned with analyzing various types or modes of ''existence'', often with special attention to the relations between particulars and universals, between intrinsic and extrinsic properties, and between essence and existence. According to [[Tom Gruber]] at [[Stanford University]], the meaning of ''ontology'' in the context of computer science is “a description of the concepts and relationships that can exist for an [[Software agent|agent]] or a community of agents.” He goes on to specify that an ontology is generally written, “as a set of definitions of formal vocabulary.” [http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html What is an Ontology?] What ontology has in common in both computer science and philosophy is the representation of entities, ideas, and events, along with their properties and relations, according to a system of categories. In both fields, one finds considerable work on problems of ontological relativity (e.g. [[Quine]] and [[Kripke]] in philosophy, [[John F. Sowa|Sowa]] and [[Nicola Guarino|Guarino]] in computer science (Top-level ontological categories. By: Sowa, John F. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 43 (November/December 1995) p. 669-85.), and debates concerning whether a normative ontology is viable (e.g. debates over [[foundationalism]] in philosophy, debates over the [[Cyc]] project in AI). Differences between the two are largely matters of focus. Philosophers are less concerned with establishing fixed, controlled vocabularies than are researchers in computer science, while computer scientists are less involved in discussions of first principles (such as debating whether there are such things as fixed essences, or whether entities must be ontologically more primary than processes). During the second half of the 20th century, philosophers extensively debated the possible methods or approaches to building ontologies, without actually ''building'' any very elaborate ontologies themselves. By contrast, computer scientists were building some large and robust ontologies (such as [[WordNet]] and [[Cyc]]) with comparatively little debate over ''how'' they were built. In the early years of the 21st century, the interdisciplinary project of [[cognitive science]] has been bringing the two circles of scholars closer together. For example, there is talk of a "computational turn in philosophy" which includes philosophers analyzing the formal ontologies of computer science (sometimes even working directly with the software), while researchers in computer science have been making more references to those philosophers who work on ontology (sometimes with direct consequences for their methods). Still, many scholars in both fields are uninvolved in this trend of cognitive science, and continue to work independently of one another, pursuing separately their different concerns. ==Resources== ===Examples of published ontologies === * [[Dublin Core]], a simple ontology for documents and publishing. * [[Cyc]] for formal representation of the universe of discourse. * [[Suggested Upper Merged Ontology]], which is a formal upper ontology * [http://www.ifomis.org/bfo/ Basic Formal Ontology (BFO)], a formal upper ontology designed to support scientific research * [[Gellish English dictionary]], an ontology that includes a dictionary and taxonomy that includes an upper ontology and a lower ontology that focusses on industrial and business applications in engineering, technology and procurement. * [http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/webspace/jb/gum/index.htm Generalized Upper Model], a linguistically-motivated ontology for mediating between clients systems and natural language technology * [[WordNet]] Lexical reference system * [[OBO Foundry]]: a suite of interoperable reference ontologies in biomedicine. * The [[Ontology for Biomedical Investigations]] is an open access, integrated ontology for the description of biological and clinical investigations. * [http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/COSMO/ COSMO]: An OWL ontology that is a merger of the basic elements of the OpenCyc and SUMO ontologies, with additional elements. * [[Gene Ontology]] for [[genomics]] * [http://pir.georgetown.edu/pro/ PRO], the Protein Ontology of the Protein Information Resource, Georgetown University. * [http://proteinontology.info/ Protein Ontology] for [[proteomics]] * [http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/AboutFM.html Foundational Model of Anatomy] for human anatomy * [[SBO]], the Systems Biology Ontology, for computational models in biology * [http://www.plantontology.org/ Plant Ontology] for plant structures and growth/development stages, etc. * [[CIDOC|CIDOC CRM]] (Conceptual Reference Model) - an ontology for "[[cultural heritage]] information". * [http://www.linguistics-ontology.org/gold.html GOLD ] ('''G'''eneral '''O'''ntology for [[descriptive linguistics|'''L'''inguistic '''D'''escription ]]) * [http://www.landcglobal.com/pages/linkbase.php Linkbase] A formal representation of the biomedical domain, founded upon [http://www.ifomis.org/bfo/ Basic Formal Ontology (BFO)]. * [http://www.loa-cnr.it/Ontologies.html Foundational, Core and Linguistic Ontologies] * [[ThoughtTreasure]] ontology * [[LPL]] Lawson Pattern Language * [[TIME-ITEM]] Topics for Indexing Medical Education * [[POPE]] Purdue Ontology for Pharmaceutical Engineering * [[IDEAS Group]] A formal ontology for enterprise architecture being developed by the Australian, Canadian, UK and U.S. Defence Depts. [http://www.ideasgroup.org The IDEAS Group Website] * [http://www.eden-study.org/articles/2007/problems-ontology-programs_ao.pdf program abstraction taxonomy] * [http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/ SWEET] Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology * [http://www.cellcycleontology.org/ CCO] The Cell-Cycle Ontology is an application ontology that represents the cell cycle ===Ontology libraries=== The development of ontologies for the Web has led to the apparition of services providing lists or directories of ontologies with search facility. Such directories have been called ontology libraries. The following are static libraries of human-selected ontologies. * The [http://www.daml.org/ontologies/ DAML Ontology Library] maintains a legacy of ontologies in DAML. * The [http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/index.php/Protege_Ontology_Library Protege Ontology Library] contains a set of owl, Frame-based and other format ontologies. * [http://www.schemaweb.info/ SchemaWeb] is a directory of RDF schemata expressed in RDFS, OWL and DAML+OIL. The following are both directories and search engines. They include crawlers searching the Web for well-formed ontologies. * [[Swoogle]] is a directory and search engine for all RDF resources available on the Web, including ontologies. * The [http://olp.dfki.de/OntoSelect/ OntoSelect] Ontology Library offers similar services for RDF/S, DAML and OWL ontologies. * [http://www.w3.org/2004/ontaria/ Ontaria] is a "searchable and browsable directory of semantic web data", with a focus on RDF vocabularies with OWL ontologies. * The [http://www.obofoundry.org/ OBO Foundry / Bioportal]is a suite of interoperable reference ontologies in biology and biomedicine. == See also == *[[Commonsense knowledge bases]] *[[Controlled vocabulary]] *[[Formal concept analysis]] *[[Lattice (order)|Lattice]] *[[Ontology alignment]] *[[Ontology editor]] *[[Ontology learning]] *[[Open Biomedical Ontologies]] *[[Soft ontology]] *[[Terminology extraction]] *[[Weak ontology]] ===Related philosophical concepts=== * [[Alphabet of human thought]] * [[Characteristica universalis]] * [[Metalanguage]] * [[Natural semantic metalanguage]] == References == {{reflist}} == External links== {{externallinks}} * [http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html What is an ontology?] * [http://www.inf.unibz.it/~franconi/dl/course/ Introduction to Description Logics DL course] by Enrico Franconi, Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bolzano, Italy * [http://www.metamodel.com/article.php?story=20030115211223271 What are the differences between a vocabulary, a taxonomy, a thesaurus, an ontology, and a meta-model?] * [http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tm-vs-thesauri.html Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! - Making sense of it all] * [[Clay Shirky]]: [http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html Ontology is Overrated] * [http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ Ontolog (a.k.a. Ontolog Forum)] - An open, international, virtual community of practice working on the application and adoption of ontological engineering and semantic technologies. * [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith's Ontology Page] * [http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/webspace/jb/info-pages/ontology/ontology-root.htm John Bateman's Ontology Portal] * [http://ontology.buffalo.edu Buffalo Ontology Site] * [http://ncor.us National Center for Ontological Research] * [http://ncbo.us National Center for Biomedical Ontology] * [http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG The Ontology and TaxonomyCoordinating Working Group] * [http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/ontology Bremen Ontology Research Group] * [http://obofoundry.org The OBO Foundry] * [http://www.loa-cnr.it The Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA)] * [http://www.ekoss.org ekoss.org - Expert Knowledge Ontology-based Semantic Search] * [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/ontologies.htm Streaming video]: "How to Build an Ontology", by Barry Smith. * [http://jena.sourceforge.net Jena – A Semantic Web Framework for Java] * [http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/DEXA.2003.1232001 Soft ontologies] * [http://www.ideasgroup.org The IDEAS Group Website] * [http://www.inmobio.epistematica.org InMoBio: Integration and Modularization of Bio-ontologies] * [http://www.ototsky.mgn.ru/it/21abreast.htm A “relativity” between Ontology and Epistemology (see part 3)] [[Category:Knowledge engineering]] [[Category:Technical communication]] [[Category:Information science]] [[Category:Semantic Web]] [[Category:Ontology (computer science)| ]] [[ar:أنتولوجيا]] [[cs:Ontologie (výpočetní technika)]] [[da:Ontologi (datalogi)]] [[de:Ontologie (Informatik)]] [[et:Ontoloogia (arvutiteadus)]] [[es:Ontología (informática)]] [[fa:هستی‌شناسی (رایانه)]] [[fr:Ontologie (informatique)]] [[ko:온톨로지]] [[hr:Ontologija (računarstvo)]] [[it:Ontologia (informatica)]] [[he:אונטולוגיה (מדעי המידע)]] [[lt:Ontologija (informatika)]] [[hu:Ontológia (mesterséges intelligencia)]] [[nl:Ontologie (informatica)]] [[ja:オントロジー]] [[pt:Ontologia (ciência da computação)]] [[ru:Онтология (информатика)]] [[sr:Онтологија (рачунарство)]] [[fi:Ontologia (tietojenkäsittelytiede)]] [[zh:本体论 (计算机)]]